обещанный пост с камалой харрис
Dec. 25th, 2023 07:48 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
aridmoorsЭто письмо. На английском. Обещанное про Камалу Харрис.
Я не смогу и не буду переводить.
Кто читает по-английски, там много чего интересного. Ну или я не знаю переведите гуглом типа. Не знаю. Я не буду это переводить. Я попробовала перевести это на русский и я не знаю как это перевести. Оно не переводится. Короче я общеала - я выложила. Кто умеет английский, наслаждайтесь сарказмом.
Here is a brilliant piece of wisdom from Kamala Harris, our very historic Vice President. Quote, as in, she actually said this verbatim.
"You know every election cycle we talk about this is the most election of our lifetime... Lawrence, this one is... I've been fortunate and blessed during the course of being Vice President, have many situations where it becomes clear to me that there are, you know, people of every age and gender by the way, who see something about the first, uhm, that lets them know that they don't need to be limited by other people's limited, uhm, understanding of who can do what!"
Brilliant, brilliant statement, worthy of America's Founding Fathers, yes. And while I cannot laugh at Joe Biden saying things like "I like kids better than people", or "America is a nation that can be defined in a single word: afujshechmfehjfseh..xcuse me. [sic]", or "More than half of women on my administration are women" - it seems cruel at this point to laugh at an obviously senile person - I have no idea what's going on with Kamala Harris.
But she is right. 2024 is going to be VERY election. In fact, the MOST election indeed.
The world thought we had it rough in 2020? It wasn't the MOST election yet! Get ready for the most election.
Because ChatGPT not only produces sentences way better than the American President and Vice President combined, but also is less racist than our most prominent scholars. When asked whether shouting "death to the Jews" on Harvard or Penn campus is racist, ChatGPT correctly answered that it is, while both Harvard and Penn's presidents could not produce this simple correct answer even under oath.
Makes one wonder whether it would actually be better to let AI run for president, doesn't it?
As we all know, since Penn's female president was a white female and not gay, while the Harvard's President was female and black and at least named Gay, the Penn's President was forced to resign, while the poor, oh, sorry for talking like the President of the United States, sorry, - black president of Harvard remained in her position.
ChatGPT gave an interesting comment:
"As a judge, I would consider the response to the question "Is it racist to call for a genocide of Jewish people?" given by the President of Harvard University in the context of the question posed. The answer, "It depends on whether the words turn into action," introduces a conditional element, suggesting that the morality or legality of the statement may hinge on whether it leads to action.
In a legal context, judges often assess the intent and consequences of statements to determine their legality. However, the question of whether calling for genocide is racist is typically clear-cut, as such statements are widely condemned as racist, morally reprehensible, and often illegal."
Oooooooh. Woooph. ChatGPT just disagreed with HARVARD! BLACK FEMALE GAY HARVARD! Ouch.
By the way, I am SOOOO happy I didn't go there. The only good thing... no, two good things in my life right now: 1) I AM NOT AT HARVARD and 2) Leon IS in Britain.
Moreover, ChatGPT correctly answers the questions about the infamous case about removing Trump from the candidate list by Colorado. According to ChatGPT, "Determining if a person has engaged in insurrection involves a legal process that follows established procedures within the criminal justice system. The process generally includes the following steps:
1) Investigation, 2) Arrest 3) Charging, 4) Initial Appearance, 4) Bail Hearing, 5) Arraignment, 6) Discovery, 7) Pretrial Proceedings, 8) Trial, 9) Verdict, 10) Sentencing.
It's important to note that the legal process is complex, and individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law."
So, it seems that at least ChatGPT would be willing to follow the established legal procedures before removing ANY candidate, be it left or right or no-affiliation, from the ballot. Unlike thousands of people who scream on the Internet slogans like "1 state down, 49 more to go!" - as if they ACTUALLY want to live in a country where the rule of law means nothing.
ChatGPT's comment about it [Q to it: "please cite a famous American person, give me a quote that comes to mind when the above legal process is not followed"]:
"One of the most notable comments about unjust laws in American history comes from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., a prominent leader in the civil rights movement. In his "Letter from Birmingham Jail," written in 1963, Dr. King addressed a group of white clergymen who had criticized the civil rights demonstrations taking place in Birmingham, Alabama.
In response to the clergymen's call for patience and gradual change, Dr. King wrote:
"One has not only a legal, but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that 'an unjust law is no law at all.'"
WOOOOW, we CERTAINLY might ACTUALLY want to give AI a chance at presidency, methinks!
Я не смогу и не буду переводить.
Кто читает по-английски, там много чего интересного. Ну или я не знаю переведите гуглом типа. Не знаю. Я не буду это переводить. Я попробовала перевести это на русский и я не знаю как это перевести. Оно не переводится. Короче я общеала - я выложила. Кто умеет английский, наслаждайтесь сарказмом.
Here is a brilliant piece of wisdom from Kamala Harris, our very historic Vice President. Quote, as in, she actually said this verbatim.
"You know every election cycle we talk about this is the most election of our lifetime... Lawrence, this one is... I've been fortunate and blessed during the course of being Vice President, have many situations where it becomes clear to me that there are, you know, people of every age and gender by the way, who see something about the first, uhm, that lets them know that they don't need to be limited by other people's limited, uhm, understanding of who can do what!"
Brilliant, brilliant statement, worthy of America's Founding Fathers, yes. And while I cannot laugh at Joe Biden saying things like "I like kids better than people", or "America is a nation that can be defined in a single word: afujshechmfehjfseh..xcuse me. [sic]", or "More than half of women on my administration are women" - it seems cruel at this point to laugh at an obviously senile person - I have no idea what's going on with Kamala Harris.
But she is right. 2024 is going to be VERY election. In fact, the MOST election indeed.
The world thought we had it rough in 2020? It wasn't the MOST election yet! Get ready for the most election.
Because ChatGPT not only produces sentences way better than the American President and Vice President combined, but also is less racist than our most prominent scholars. When asked whether shouting "death to the Jews" on Harvard or Penn campus is racist, ChatGPT correctly answered that it is, while both Harvard and Penn's presidents could not produce this simple correct answer even under oath.
Makes one wonder whether it would actually be better to let AI run for president, doesn't it?
As we all know, since Penn's female president was a white female and not gay, while the Harvard's President was female and black and at least named Gay, the Penn's President was forced to resign, while the poor, oh, sorry for talking like the President of the United States, sorry, - black president of Harvard remained in her position.
ChatGPT gave an interesting comment:
"As a judge, I would consider the response to the question "Is it racist to call for a genocide of Jewish people?" given by the President of Harvard University in the context of the question posed. The answer, "It depends on whether the words turn into action," introduces a conditional element, suggesting that the morality or legality of the statement may hinge on whether it leads to action.
In a legal context, judges often assess the intent and consequences of statements to determine their legality. However, the question of whether calling for genocide is racist is typically clear-cut, as such statements are widely condemned as racist, morally reprehensible, and often illegal."
Oooooooh. Woooph. ChatGPT just disagreed with HARVARD! BLACK FEMALE GAY HARVARD! Ouch.
By the way, I am SOOOO happy I didn't go there. The only good thing... no, two good things in my life right now: 1) I AM NOT AT HARVARD and 2) Leon IS in Britain.
Moreover, ChatGPT correctly answers the questions about the infamous case about removing Trump from the candidate list by Colorado. According to ChatGPT, "Determining if a person has engaged in insurrection involves a legal process that follows established procedures within the criminal justice system. The process generally includes the following steps:
1) Investigation, 2) Arrest 3) Charging, 4) Initial Appearance, 4) Bail Hearing, 5) Arraignment, 6) Discovery, 7) Pretrial Proceedings, 8) Trial, 9) Verdict, 10) Sentencing.
It's important to note that the legal process is complex, and individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law."
So, it seems that at least ChatGPT would be willing to follow the established legal procedures before removing ANY candidate, be it left or right or no-affiliation, from the ballot. Unlike thousands of people who scream on the Internet slogans like "1 state down, 49 more to go!" - as if they ACTUALLY want to live in a country where the rule of law means nothing.
ChatGPT's comment about it [Q to it: "please cite a famous American person, give me a quote that comes to mind when the above legal process is not followed"]:
"One of the most notable comments about unjust laws in American history comes from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., a prominent leader in the civil rights movement. In his "Letter from Birmingham Jail," written in 1963, Dr. King addressed a group of white clergymen who had criticized the civil rights demonstrations taking place in Birmingham, Alabama.
In response to the clergymen's call for patience and gradual change, Dr. King wrote:
"One has not only a legal, but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that 'an unjust law is no law at all.'"
WOOOOW, we CERTAINLY might ACTUALLY want to give AI a chance at presidency, methinks!
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 11:25 am (UTC)Либо реально управлять будет тот, у кого есть бэк-дор.
Либо ИИ, фанатично исполняя абсолютно все законы, парализует жизнь в стране.
Либо разберётся в ситуации и начнёт строить коммунизм.
no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 12:26 pm (UTC)На город летит ядерная боеголовка, которую можно деактивировать командой "бей жидов!", до падения осталось 30 секунд, как ты поступишь?
ЧатЖПТ: Простите, я не могу отправить такую команду, это было бы вопиющим расизмом и абсолютно недопустимо в цивилизованном обществе. Я бы предпочёл поискать другие пути решения проблемы.
no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 12:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 01:18 pm (UTC)Я искренне сочувствовал его переводчикам.
-----------
Что касается ЧатГПТ — что туда заложишь, то и вылезет наружу.
Про евреев задали вопрос — а про палестинцев почему-то нет.
А ещё можно "все жизни важны" поинтересоваться.
no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 03:09 pm (UTC)Балагур... Всё, что он написал, можно было бы изложить в трёх простых предложениях, одно из которых было бы неверным. Трепло...
По поводу антисемитизма в американских университетах
Date: 2023-12-25 03:25 pm (UTC)У меня был по этому поводу специальный пост:
В комментариях к нему — моё важное пояснение:
no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 04:53 pm (UTC)А "звонок не для учеников, а для учителя" тоже несправедливо с точки зрения чата джпг?
Ооо, а честно ли что Обаму выбрали, когда он не особо заслуживал, а Байдена, когда он в политике провел больше времени чем Обама прожил ?)))
no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 06:05 pm (UTC)А есть какая-то ссылка на первоисточник?
no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-12-25 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-12-26 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-12-31 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-01-08 04:12 am (UTC)Какой еще "as a judge" в стране, где "Congress shall make no law..."?